Felix is expected to head back to Madrid this summer where another decision on his future will be made. Chelsea, who have made a good home for the talented attacker, aren't out of the running with his love of London made clear throughout his time in the capital.
Five-man Chelsea striker shortlist'revealed' by Mauricio Pochettino, with £517 million question addressed
Felix will have other suitors snooping around him in anticipation of a summer clearout at Stamford Bridge, an upcoming new manager, and a desire to play in the Champions League. However, the possibility of Atletico Madrid recovering more than £80 million for him on a long-term contract has cast doubt on such a scenario.
The Portuguese site Eleven Sport wrote on Instagram: "[Translated] Newspaper, Marca, write that only Newcastle are willing to pay the $100m Atletico wants [for Felix]." Newcastle and Manchester United are only two of the teams associated with making a move for him at the end of the season.
Fabrizio Romano believes Joe Shields could aid Chelsea in Romeo Lavia pursuit
According to Fabrizio Romano , Chelsea admire Southampton star Romeo Lavia a lot and are very interested in signing the 19-year-old once the summer transfer window opens. Additionally, he stated that Joe Shields , the current co-director of recruitment for Chelsea, can aid the Blues in luring the Saints’ youngster to the club given their longstanding relationship. In many ways, he could prove to be the Blues’ hidden weapon. With relegation already guaranteed, Lavia could lead an exodus of players who are expected to leave Southampton in the summer. Liverpool are also in the fray for the youngster, making life difficult for Chelsea. And Lavia, who joined Southampton last July, is anticipated to cost any team somewhere in the range of £45 million and £50 million . While it is a rather hefty amount, Lavia could become a mainstay in our midfield for years to come. Meanwhile, Romano claims in his daily briefing with GIVEMESPORT . He believes Shields who signed the player earlier f
0 Comments